I've been involved in a workshop today co-run with Help the Hospices and NCVO, with some hospice Chief Execs. We were mainly looking at the external environment as a context for strategy development, but ended up having a late afternoon conversation about 'surviving' and 'thriving'. This stimulated me to ponder the characteristics that differentiate organisations who will (merely) survive versus the characteristics of those who will thrive. Partucularly as vcos face the turbulent external environment. Any thoughts? It would be great if we could use this space to explore what these characteristics might be....
This comment was last edited on Feb 12, 2010
I have been working with the idea of the healthy organsiation , ; this is by Philip Stokoe
There are 3 factors which I think are common to all organisations, from industry to the helping services
The factors common to all are:
1. Clarity about the Primary Task (what we are all here to do).
2. Clarity about Shared Principles (how we set about the Primary Task).
3. Clarity about the different layers in the hierarchy, specifically what decision-making is delegated to each level and with what authority.
If that is the basis for health, then it is interesting to think about 'thriving '. My immediate response is creativity, as tht moves th energy from maintainence to growth.
This comment was last edited on Feb 12, 2010
I would throw down a challenge to name a company or organisation which has been in existence for more than 300 years and which does/did not have a philanthropic outlook at its heart. Corporate Social Responsibility is seen as a new initiative, but one that has been practised by Quakers for many centuries and many major companies have Quaker roots to thank for their longevity (Cadbury, Lloyds, Amnesty International, Oxfam). So how about a list of the Quaker values as a guide to developing a thriving organisation, namely: peace, equality, integrity, simplicty?
This comment was last edited on Feb 12, 2010
